Sunday, 19 February 2012


Teachers as leaders

“If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.” (John Quincy Adams)

John Quincy Adams was on to something with this quote. I hope as a teacher I embody the attributes he describes a leader possessing. Teachers are dynamic people and I would argue need to be. To get 20-25 students to pay attention to you and be invested in what you are teaching requires a certain amount of charisma.

Being a leader seems like a natural extension of the role that I must fulfill as a teacher. I think that the two words: leader and teacher, are actually very interconnected. One does not really exist without the other. If I cannot inspire my students and encourage them to be invested in their learning, I cannot teach. Leadership is teaching.

In class we learned about some different definitions and characteristics of leaders but the definitions and attributes always came back to one important point: a leader helps people accomplish __.

When I started thinking about leadership it took me back to my first practicum this fall with my dear grade 3’s. I actually taught the students a lesson on leadership. In this lesson I was teaching students about the difference between informal and formal leaders. These bright young students were able to begin contemplating some of the abstract ideas about leadership.

In this lesson students were able to make connections that leaders do not always have to be the “boss” to be a leader. Or more figuratively, students acknowledged that a leader isn’t necessarily the person at the “top”. As one student insightfully responded “You can be a leader from the front or the back of a line. Sometimes the leader doesn’t stand at the front.” Ahh, for anyone who has every underestimated a child please re-read that non-verbatim statement. This student is 8 years old and was clearly on to something.

Teachers are leaders in society, but most importantly are leaders in classrooms. However, an effective teacher knows you don’t have to stand at the front of the class to lead students in learning. In fact, effective teachers know that the best learning usually doesn’t occur at the front of the room when they are talking. Being a good leader isn’t about always being at the front, just as my 8 year old little philosopher innately understood. A good leader is about inspiring others and helping others accomplish their goals. A good leader provides people with the assistance, encouragement, and support they need. A good leader knows that doing it all and telling others how to act and who to be are not the characteristics of a leader. Good leaders know that they must adjust their leadership tactics to suit the group or person they are interacting with. Good leaders know that it is a dynamic and ever-changing process. Good leaders encourage both independence, and community. Good leaders build morale.

A good leader is an effective teacher.

And effective teacher inspires students to be their best.  
Financing Public Education


Song: “Money, money, money, money. Mooooney.”  Come on now, sing it in your head. ;)

Money. It appears to make the world go round and everyone wants more of it, educational institutions included. And so began my week in class…

We discussed financing in education this week, if you hadn’t already guessed. I really hope you have that song stuck in your head now. I typed it out for you so would have to suffer the same torture as me. I cannot get it out of my head. It can play through your head and add a certain ambiance to my blog as you read it.

I really hope that someone who is reading this blog is laughing with me… ahh… to be funny… what a gift. I am jealous of those of you who have been so blessed with the gift of natural humour.

However, in all seriousness financing in education is an extremely important topic. And expensive…

There is a compelling dilemma in our public education system… and that is finding enough money to pay well-educated professionals to do the very important job of educating the youth of our society. In addition, as education becomes an increasingly complex service, it is also becoming more expensive.

People who like to refer to the “good ol’ days” when education wasn’t so complicated or expensive also tend to forget the staggering statistics. A large percentage of students never graduated, post-secondary education was rare, education for students with disabilities was non-existent, and differentiated instruction was some kind of far off incomprehensible idea (What, you mean to say not all children can learn from reading and memorizing a textbook?).  So the people who have a love affair with the “good ol’ days” tend to wear their rose tinted glasses and fail to recognize the progress that is occurring and has occurred in education. But I have a feeling trying to change the “good ol days” people would be about as productive as trying to hammer a nail with a hammer made of styrofoam.

The optimist in me, however, really does believe that despite what the naysayers would have you believe that our education system really is improving. My family could attest to this… On my mother’s side of the family neither of my grandparents attained higher than a grade 8 or 9 education. Only one of my aunts graduated from high school and my mother completed her GED (an accomplishment I am extremely proud of her for). My mom’s 4 other siblings did not graduate from high school. However, all of my cousins have graduated from high school but one. A handful have went on to college or are working on university degrees. I was the first person in my mom’s family to graduate with a university degree. To me that is progress. Exciting progress; our school system is doing something right.

However, despite this progress the public school system is facing new challenges, quite a diverse number challenges really but the one I’d like to focus on is the financial challenges the education system is facing. Income is not increasing at the rate that the cost of education is. This is a big problem. An unsustainable problem.

The public school system is funded from local taxes and provincial funding. Local taxes are collected by the school board via property taxes. This antiquated system has served our country relatively well for a sustained amount of time, but some would argue is a flawed system. Particularly, because of the high amounts of property taxes farmers pay. In addition, every year school boards are scurrying trying to find ways to cut their budgets, but still require tax increases nonetheless. 

Teachers are not paid a crazy amount of money for what they do. Considering their education and high level of responsibility, many might even argue they are underpaid. However, this is a separate discussion… That being said wages take up the largest percentage of a school board budget, and wages are not increasing at the rate that expenditures are. Hmmm another problem…  A complex problem.

In class we all participated in a role playing activity in small groups. We were asked to try and find ways to cut a mock school board budget by 1.2 million dollars. This proved to be an excessively challenging task. And lead to me asking a big question (much to the dismay of my classmates): Why are not looking for alternative sources of revenue?

Trying to always be cutting a budget is not realistic in a world where the cost of everything else in constantly rising. In fact, it is non-sensical. There is always room for efficiency skimming, I would argue. As there are always inefficiencies in any large agency. However, trying to cut a budget every year by millions of dollars when 57% percent of that budget is taken up from wages is simply not sustainable. Either teachers are indeed over paid (which the good ol’ day’ers would have you believe) or we need to find a new way to think about funding education. Increasing taxes year after year is not sustainable either.

In class I asked why we couldn’t be more business minded in our funding approaches to education. I pointed out in our mock activity that we really only needed another $133 per student. I argued that $33 dollars of that could be considered efficiency skimming but asked why we couldn’t find a way to come up with the other $100 per student. This lead to me making several poor suggestions for how we could get the extra money (which I felt embarrassed about even suggesting afterwards but honest, I was just thinking on the spot) because as it turned out I couldn’t think of any good ways to make my idea come to fruition.

This led me to the discussion I had with my fiancĂ© that inspired me to write this blog on a Saturday night. As we drove the hour long drive to my parent’s house he listened to me talk about what I had learned in class… and the questions I had raised… and the bad ideas I had shared. He thought it was a good idea to consider alternative ways to fund schools but agreed with my professor and the flaws she pointed out in my thinking about how such changes could be integrated into a school. And it’s true, they both are right: education needs to be a publically funded endeavour because going to school needs to be an equal opportunity endeavour.

But nonetheless I find myself mulling over how this dilemma could be solved. And on this Saturday night, despite some stimulating conversation with my fiancé, I find myself being incredibly grateful I am not a politician right now trying to find the solution. However, I have great faith that with many minds can come some great ideas.


Side Note:
After writing this post I stumbled across this article, an interesting read. What is the optimum rate of taxation for the greatest rate of return?


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/commentary/neil-reynolds/a-taxing-dilemma-whats-the-optimal-rate-for-the-rich/article2329833/



Governance of Public Education in Canada

Ahhh, such an interesting topic… I am sure those of you who have been reading this blog… silence… crickets chirping… um anyone?, will be so excited to read about this particular topic. Haha.

Sorry, I really never have been very good at being intentionally funny. Can you tell?

Well, this week in class we discussed the governance of public education in Canada and while it might sound a little dry, it actually was a worthwhile topic. Educating myself on the inner workings of the establishment I plan to work for is a no brainer. And, I would argue, should be for all teachers. You cannot change what you do not understand!

Being newly educated on the topic, but still relatively uninformed in the grand scheme of things, I have to say, I think that our governing structure is a little archaic. However, that would also imply that a lot of governing structures are archaic since the governing structure for public schools is pretty similar to a lot of other companies and levels of government in our country.

When I say archaic, what I really mean is that I think there is room for change. I think a visual will be the easiest way for me to make my point. Observe the distance between this sentence I am typing right here, as I begin to type out the levels of governance…  
                                                                                                             
Provincial Government


School Divisions and School Boards


Superintendent of Schools

School Level
 

Principal/Vice Principal


Teachers and Staff

…and my sentence all the way down here. Arguably if this were a building, it would likely be a sky scraper and that means that it would be pretty hard for the people on the main level to BE HEARD BY THE PEOPLE ON THE TOP LEVEL.

Admittedly, I have no better idea or system really because this kind of hierarchical system is all I know and is the system used for almost every kind of governance. And it does have its place. However, I would argue that its inadequacies are also being put on centre stage as the world economy continues to flounder and struggle. The system is crying for help. This kind of governance structure was designed for efficiency, unfortunately more often than not functions pretty inefficiently.

Education is chronically underfunded and always needs more money. But if we go back to that sky scraper analogy it becomes pretty easy to imagine how difficult it is for the people on the main floor to get what they need if the people on the top don’t really ever come visit but still make all the decisions. I’m not trying to imply that people that are the problem in levels of governance (well maybe sometimes, but I’m an optimist and tend to see the best in others ), it is the scale. The people at the top don’t have time to go and talk to all of the people at the bottom, there isn’t enough people at the top or hours in the day to ever be able to. At the same time if the people at the bottom tried to make all the decisions, it would be hard because their own circumstances and subjectivity would make it harder to make the tough calls. In addition, there would just be too many people trying to make decisions and that’s complicated too.

Nonetheless, having people at the top making big decisions for all of the people at the bottom is a problem if the people at the top are disconnected from what is happening at the bottom. But this argument has grown entirely too big for governance in public education and is really an argument for levels of governance in general. And it isn’t really an argument, rather more of an observation because I have no suggestions for how it could be productively changed.

The observations are important though. Not because my observations are earth shattering or radical but because these kinds of observations begin conversations, and conversations can lead to in-depth discussions and discussions can lead to planning and planning can lead to action and action can lead to change.

As educators it is important for us to make observations and have conversations. Lots of those conversations will never become anything more than just that, a conversation. But every once in a while a conversation just might lead to something more- progress. And an education system that is progressive will lead to a society that thinks more progressive. My rhetoric might be getting old, but it’s true. You want to change society? Start in a classroom.


An article I discovered a few weeks after writing this post about Canada's Aboriginal Education System:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/putting-the-system-in-education-for-on-reserve-students/article2349550/

Saturday, 4 February 2012



Thinking about Canada’s Educational Past

On Thursday January 26th we continued discussing the history of Canadian Education in class. Inevitably, this led to a discussion about residential schools. While discussing Canada’s not so distant past was an important class to have, the tension and unease was palpable. For myself included, I must admit. I struggled to articulate what I wanted to say on the topic. Mostly, I suppose, because I didn’t really know what to say but knew I wanted our class to discuss the topic nonetheless.

I have no answers or solutions to the problems my country created when stripping Aboriginals of their culture and rights… and I know there is no apology that could ever ease the pain that has and continues to haunt First Nations People in this county.

Aboriginal culture continues to be misunderstood and stereotyped in Canada, I believe. My own education on the history of the First Nations People in Canada sorely lacks. In fact, I was never educated about the cultural genocide of Frist Nations People in Canada. It is this lack of understanding and information, I would argue, that seems to sit at the heart of so much racism and bigotry. The irony tastes bitter on my tongue when I consider the information laden world we exist in.

Canadians like to think that the maltreatment of Aboriginals occurred in the past, seldom realizing that the last residential school closed in 1996. Yet, people like to close their eyes to the things they would rather not see. Our blindness appears to have created additional problems in our society; Attawapiskat First Nation quickly comes to mind… However, it is not for me to try and dissect our current political climate in this blog as I lack the information and research and therefore, arguably, lack insight.

 What I do know is that the history of residential schools should serve as a chilling reminder to anyone working in the education system. Society might forget or try to undermine the importance of education. However, the impact of residential schools on Aboriginals in Canada is a sad reminder that indeed, education does shape the minds of the young and therefore society’s future. What I do today in a classroom will undeniably have an effect on what happens tomorrow. 


An addition from the original publication:
I read this article in the Globe and Mail, ironically, after writing this post. Check it out:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/editorials/aboriginal-education-gaps-can-no-longer-be-tolerated/article2333517/